By Bruce L. Katcher, Ph.D. President, Discovery Surveys, Inc.
2 out of 3 employees feel that their organization tolerates poor performers.
Part 1 - THE DILEMMA
Poor performers!
Every organization has them. Im talking about employees who do the bare minimum. They dont break any company rules. And they dont make any blatant or costly mistakes. However, they are probably harmful to the organization.
What should be done?
Organizations that allow poor performers to just coast risk being perceived by other employees as indecisive and ineffective. They also risk alienating good performers that may believe that management doesnt have a clue as to who is performing well and who is not. Typical complaints from these employees are:
"Why should I work hard if so and so gets by on less?"
"I should be making more money than so and so;"
"I have to work harder because of so and so;" and
"Its just not fair."
However, simply terminating poor performers may backfire in the long run because:
- It is difficult to find replacements
In todays tight job market, management often feels that keeping a marginally performing employee is often better than hiring an unknown quantity that may not last.
- Employee commitment may suffer
Employee commitment is fragile. Terminating marginal performers may signal to average and good performers that management doesnt really care about its people.
- Morale may decline
Employees may no longer view the organization as a fun place to work. In addition, they may become paralyzed due to fear and paranoia.
Part 2 - WHAT CAN BE DONE?
Parting ways may be the best solution when no other option is possible. However, the following options should be carefully considered first.
Schedule a time to meet with the employee to discuss the situation. Dont wait until the annual performance review. Try to identify what is causing the performance problems and how they can be improved. Explore potential causes both inside and outside of the work place. Most importantly, make the employee a partner in identifying possible solutions.
Sometimes a different supervisor may be able to bring the best out of a low performing employee.
Organizations as well as employees are constantly changing. Perhaps a different job within the organization would better suit this employee.
The skill set of the employee may need to be upgraded or changed.
I am very much
interested in your views on this topic.
Please reply with your comments and
suggestions to .
All material is © copyright , Discovery Surveys, Inc.,